LINKED LIST
[txt mode]
▸
Things I Was Wrong About: Types
home
explore
|
log in
Things I Was Wrong About: Types
v5.chriskrycho.com · first added by
@afreshcup
· 2026-09-30 · 2 upvotes
log in
to save, upvote or flag this.
─── In 0 lists ─────────────────────────────────────────
(not in any lists yet)
─── Discussions ────────────────────────────────────────
*
Things I Was Wrong About: Types
351 pts · 460 comments ·
node
─── From the discussion ────────────────────────────────
*
No, dynamic type systems are not inherently more open
lexi-lambda.github.io ·
node
*
Dynamic Languages are Static Languages
existentialtype.wordpress.com ·
node
*
https://dotty.epfl.ch/docs/reference/new-types/union-types.html
dotty.epfl.ch ·
node
*
The Typed Racket Reference
docs.racket-lang.org ·
node
*
http://book.realworldhaskell.org/
book.realworldhaskell.org ·
node